
One coordinator, twenty hours a week, stacks of paper vouchers. That is how the USS Midway Museum — the aircraft-carrier museum in San Diego — was still reconciling ticket sales through travel resellers just a few years ago. Today the same museum sells timed-entry tickets in 13 languages through the Tiqets platform, without a single sheet of paper. Ticket revenue through the platform has doubled since 2019, more than 25,000 tickets have been sold — and a full 70% of European ticket sales arrive through this one channel.
That last figure is the one that should make every museum sit up: these are not visitors the museum could have reached on its own. They are European travellers who bought their ticket in their own language, on a platform they already trust — before they even knew what the museum was called.
Before: a visitor from Germany finds the museum through a reseller, receives a paper voucher, swaps it for a ticket at the entrance, and staff collect the vouchers by hand and reconcile them against invoices at the end of the month. Every reseller with its own system, its own counting, its own mistakes.
After: the visitor buys a QR-code ticket with a chosen time slot on a page in their own language. The code is scanned at the entrance, capacity manages itself, and every sale is automatically attributed to the right channel in the background. Time slots gave the museum crowd control during the pandemic — and today, a more even flow of visitors across the day.

The technical core is a link between the museum's ticketing system (Gateway Ticketing / Galaxy) and the Tiqets platform via an API integration. The key components:
An honest caveat: the figures come from a case study published by Tiqets itself — they are self-reported and have not been audited by any third party. But the order of magnitude (25,000+ tickets, doubled revenue, 70% European sales) is consistent with what more independently designed measurements show for the industry as a whole: a study of 238 experience providers measured 36–41% growth in total revenue within 12 months of joining OTAs, with direct bookings also up 14%.
A museum website reaches the people who are already looking for the museum. An OTA reaches the people looking for things to do in a city — and with foreign visitors, that is the difference that decides everything. The USS Midway did not double its revenue because Americans suddenly started visiting more museums; it doubled it because it became visible to European travellers at the moment they were planning their trip.
The second reason is friction. Paper voucher, exchange at the desk, a queue — every step turns some visitors away. A QR code with a time slot removed all three at once.

Museums face the same structural problem and the same opportunity: a foreign guest in Ljubljana, Bled or Postojna plans the day on Viator, GetYourGuide or Tiqets — not on a public institution's website. If your ticket is not there, the day goes elsewhere.
Three steps this case points to:
HopGuides sets museums up end to end: listing on Viator and GetYourGuide, scan-based entrance records, and a monthly reconciliation ready for your accounting team. Write to klemen.furlan@hopguides.art.
Does OTA selling cannibalise our direct sales? Measurements suggest the opposite: in the study of 238 providers, direct bookings grew by 14% (revenue) and 18% (tickets) after joining OTAs — the platform also works as a billboard, and some guests who see it there end up buying direct.
How much does it cost to join? Platforms generally charge no upfront fees — you pay commission on actual sales. The cost only arises together with the revenue.
Do we need an expensive ticketing system like the USS Midway's? No. The same result — QR ticket, entrance records, monthly settlement — is achievable with a far lighter setup; what matters is only that scanning and settlement are not manual processes.
Where do the numbers in this article come from? From a case study by the Tiqets platform (2021, self-reported) and an aggregate measurement by GetYourGuide with partners FareHarbor, Bókun and Ventrata (238 providers, 24 months). Both have a commercial interest — treat the numbers as directional, not audited.